* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com> [110419 17:13]:
> Hi Tony and Russell,
> 
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:17 +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com> [110418 09:57]:
> 
> > > So, I can make a patch that removes the SRAM support from omapfb, and
> > > queue it up for the next merge window.
> > 
> > OK. That patch should probably go into Russell's tree along with
> > other SRAM related patches to avoid conflicts.
> 
> Here's a simple patch to remove SRAM support from omapfb. Or more
> precisely, this just disables it.
> 
> I started to remove the SRAM support from the drivers, but the patches
> got quite big and will probably cause conflicts if they reside in
> somebody else's tree than mine. So I believe it's easiest to divide SRAM
> FB removal into this patch, handled by Russell (?), and then the rest,
> handled by me.

OK sounds like a plan.
 
> Is there something else related to OMAP FB than the code removed in this
> patch that is hindering the SRAM work?

I think we can now also remove sram_ceil and omap_sram_push_address?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to