Kevin,
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:32, Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> wrote:
> Cleanup IRQ status handling by by passing IRQ status register offsets
> via platform data.
Typo: by by
>
> Cleans up clearing of GPIO IRQ status and GPIO ISR handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com>
> ---
<<snip>>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> index 268bccd..aedd732 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,8 @@ struct omap_gpio_reg_offs {
> u16 dataout;
> u16 set_dataout;
> u16 clr_dataout;
> + u16 irqstatus;
> + u16 irqstatus2;
Would it be appropriate to name them as (irqstatus1 & irqstatus2)
or (irqstatus & irqstatus1)?
-V Charulatha
> };
>
> struct omap_gpio_platform_data {
> --
> 1.7.4
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
