On 6/28/2011 10:14 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 10:10 +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On 6/28/2011 8:40 AM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 18:33 +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Previously, main_clk was a fake clock node that was accessing the
PRCM modulemode register. Since the module mode is directly
controlled by the hwmod fmwk, these fake clock node are not
needed anymore. The hwmod main_clk will point directly to the
input clock node if applicable.
For example, some IPs, like the GPIOs, do not have any functional
clock and are using only the iclk. In that case, the main_clk
field will be empty.
In the case of the DSS, we can now consider all the optional clock as
main clock.
That will simplify greatly the driver management and the integration
with hwmod.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cous...@ti.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen<tomi.valkei...@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley<p...@pwsan.com>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak<rna...@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 111
+++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
index e10d3f7..5c196a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
<snip>
@@ -1456,7 +1455,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod omap44xx_dss_dsi1_hwmod = {
.mpu_irqs_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap44xx_dss_dsi1_irqs),
.sdma_reqs = omap44xx_dss_dsi1_sdma_reqs,
.sdma_reqs_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap44xx_dss_dsi1_sdma_reqs),
- .main_clk = "dss_fck",
+ .main_clk = "dss_sys_clk",
.prcm = {
.omap4 = {
.clkctrl_offs = OMAP4_CM_DSS_DSS_CLKCTRL_OFFSET,
Hmm... I don't think this is right. By default the DSI uses dss_dss_clk
as the functional clock. sys_clk goes to the DSI PLL, and the output of
which can be later used as the fclk for DSI. But that requires setup.
OK, it was not super clear from the DSS clock tree which one should be
the main one.
So you'd prefer to have the dss_dss_clk as main clock and keep the
dss_sys_clk as a opt_clock?
Yes, I think that makes more sense.
My patch set had dss_dss_clk as the mainclock for all DSS blocks. You
have it a bit differently for venc, hdmi, rfbi.
Yep, I saw that but, I don't think it should be done like that.
It's a bit difficult to
verify those, as the DSS and DISPC are anyway enabled before
venc/hdmi/rfbi, so the dss_dss_clk is anyway enabled. But they do make
sense by looking at the clock tree.
Mmm, I'm not sure of that. In theory the dss_dss_clk is mainly the
functional clock for the DISPC. It can be used as the source clock for
some other module like DSI, but it is not mandatory.
In the case of venc, rfbi and hdmi, that dss_dss_clk is not even
connected to them.
You do have a functional dependency between the DISPC and all the DSS
IPs, but that does not mean that the dss_dss_clk should be affected to
all the sub IPs.
This is up to your driver stack to handle that functional dependency.
That's why here I was trying to focus only on the main functionnal clock
for each IP. There is no point to expose the dss_dss_clk to every hwmod
if the driver does not have anything to do with them.
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html