On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Santosh <santosh.shilim...@ti.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 16 August 2011 07:13 PM, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote: >> >> From: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath...@ti.com> >> >> This patch adds wake up latency numbers for OMAP4. Note that these are >> preliminary numbers and need to be relooked. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath...@ti.com> >> >> The INACTIVE state is added as unsupported. >> > In that case, don't add that support in first place. When INA support is > getting added, you can update these as well. No. A value is needed for all states, even if unsupported at the moment. Omitting a value causes it to be set to '0', which means 'no latency'.
Jean -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
