On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:01PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Modify the twl regulator driver to extract the regulator_init_data from
> device tree when passed, instead of getting it through platform_data
> structures (on non-DT builds)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c 
> b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
> index ee8747f..df1b95a 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>  #include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c/twl.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_regulator.h>
>  
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1011,6 +1013,9 @@ static int __devinit twlreg_probe(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>       struct regulation_constraints   *c;
>       struct regulator_dev            *rdev;
>  
> +     if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> +             of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "ti,reg-id", &pdev->id);
> +

Don't do this.  As much as possible, don't reply on plaform_device->id
when using DT.  Plus it is illegal to modify pdev->id after the device
is registered.

>       for (i = 0, info = NULL; i < ARRAY_SIZE(twl_regs); i++) {
>               if (twl_regs[i].desc.id != pdev->id)
>                       continue;
> @@ -1020,7 +1025,11 @@ static int __devinit twlreg_probe(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>       if (!info)
>               return -ENODEV;
>  
> -     initdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +     if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> +             initdata = of_get_regulator_init_data(pdev->dev.of_node);
> +     else
> +             initdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +
>       if (!initdata)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -1101,14 +1110,27 @@ static int __devexit twlreg_remove(struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  MODULE_ALIAS("platform:twl_reg");
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +static const struct of_device_id twl_of_match[] __devinitconst = {
> +     { .compatible = "ti,twl-reg", },

This looks rather generic.  Is this a specific chip?  It should be.

g.

> +     {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, twl_of_match);
> +#else
> +#define twl_of_match NULL
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct platform_driver twlreg_driver = {
>       .probe          = twlreg_probe,
>       .remove         = __devexit_p(twlreg_remove),
>       /* NOTE: short name, to work around driver model truncation of
>        * "twl_regulator.12" (and friends) to "twl_regulator.1".
>        */
> -     .driver.name    = "twl_reg",
> -     .driver.owner   = THIS_MODULE,
> +     .driver  = {
> +             .name  = "twl_reg",
> +             .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +             .of_match_table = twl_of_match,
> +     },
>  };
>  
>  static int __init twlreg_init(void)
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to