On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:47:51AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > After implementing both schemes (ie. interrupts+interrupt-names && [*-]gpios) > I definitely prefer the fixed property name plus a separate names property. > It is easier to use common code with that scheme, and easier to statically > check for correctness.
It's not a fantastic experience when using the bindings as the arrays grow large, though - keeping things matched up isn't much fun especially if any of the elements in the array are optional. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
