On 03/19/2012 09:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 19 March 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:47:51AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>>> After implementing both schemes (ie. interrupts+interrupt-names && 
>>> [*-]gpios)
>>> I definitely prefer the fixed property name plus a separate names property.
>>> It is easier to use common code with that scheme, and easier to statically
>>> check for correctness.
>>
>> It's not a fantastic experience when using the bindings as the arrays
>> grow large, though - keeping things matched up isn't much fun especially
>> if any of the elements in the array are optional.
> 
> Maybe one can use named properties in a new device node in that case,
> like this:
> 
>       bus {
>               dma: dma-controller {
>                       #dma-cells = <1>;
>               };
> 
>               device {
>                       compatible = "device";
>                       channel: dma-channel {
>                               type = <0x1>;
>                               name = "foo";
>                               number = <23>;
>                               direction = <3>;
>                       };
>                       dma-requests = <&dma &channel>;
>               };
>       };

For reference, this is very similar to how the pinctrl bindings work,
except that they require the "channel" node to be a child of the DMA
controller, and hence "dma-requests" doesn't contain <&dma &channel>,
just <&channel>, since "dma" is the parent (or grand-parent) of "channel".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to