On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Paul Walmsley wrote:

> The references to "wkup_pwrdm" on some of these clockdomains don't 
> look right to me.  For example, this clockdomain is listed as being in 
> AM43XX_CM_WKUP_INST, but its enclosing powerdomain is listed as being in 
> AM43XX_PRM_WKUP_INST.  Looks to me like it's best to have two different 
> wakeup powerdomains: one CM_WKUP, and one PRM_WKUP.

Looks like the same problem exists with at least the PER powerdomain also.  
Looks to me like that needs to be split into cm_per and prm_per variants?


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to