Hi Paul,
On Monday 30 September 2013 03:57 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
>> From: Ambresh K <ambr...@ti.com>
>>
>> Add the data file to describe all power domains in AM43x SoC.
>> OMAP4 powerdomain operations is being reused here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ambresh K <ambr...@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <af...@ti.com>
>
> ...
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomains43xx_data.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
>
> ...
>
>> +static struct powerdomain per_43xx_pwrdm = {
>> + .name = "per_pwrdm",
>> + .voltdm = { .name = "core" },
>> + .prcm_offs = AM43XX_PRM_PER_INST,
>> + .prcm_partition = AM43XX_PRM_PARTITION,
>> + .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_RET_ON,
>> + .pwrsts_logic_ret = PWRSTS_OFF_RET,
>> + .banks = 4,
>> + .pwrsts_mem_ret = {
>> + [0] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* icss_mem */
>> + [1] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* per_mem */
>> + [2] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* ram1_mem */
>> + [3] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* ram2_mem */
>> + },
>> + .pwrsts_mem_on = {
>> + [0] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* icss_mem */
>> + [1] = PWRSTS_ON, /* per_mem */
>> + [2] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* ram1_mem */
>> + [3] = PWRSTS_OFF_RET, /* ram2_mem */
>> + },
>> + .flags = PWRDM_HAS_LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE,
>> +};
>
> The pwrsts_mem_on flags don't make any sense here for banks 0, 2, and 3.
> They claim that those banks can never be turned on. Could you please
> doublecheck these?
Checked it, they should be PWRSTS_ON, I will fix it.
Regards
Afzal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
