On Friday March 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear All, > > We have a number of machines running 4TB raid5 arrays. > Occasionally one of these machines will lock up solid and > will need power cycling. Often when this happens, the > array will refuse to restart with 'cannot start dirty > degraded array'. Usually mdadm --assemble --force will > get the thing going again - although it will then do > a complete resync. > > > My question is: Is there any way I can make the array > more robust? I don't mind it losing a single drive and > having to resync when we get a lockup - but having to > do a forced assemble always makes me nervous, and means > that this sort of crash has to be escalated to a senior > engineer.
Why is the array degraded? Having a crash while the array is degraded can cause undetectable data loss. That is why md won't assemble the array itself: you need to know there could be a problem. But a crash with a degraded array should be fairly unusual. If it is happening a lot, then there must be something wrong with your config: either you are running degraded a lot (which is not safe, don't do it), or md cannot find all the devices to assemble. > > > Typical syslog: > > > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: autorun ... > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: considering sdh1 ... > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: adding sdh1 ... > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: adding sdg1 ... > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: adding sdf1 ... > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: adding sde1 ... > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: adding sdd1 ... > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: adding sdc1 ... > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: adding sda1 ... > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: created md0 > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: bind<sda1> > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: bind<sdc1> > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: bind<sdd1> > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: bind<sde1> > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: bind<sdf1> > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: bind<sdg1> > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: bind<sdh1> > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: running: > <sdh1><sdg1><sdf1><sde1><sdd1><sdc1><sda1> > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: md: md0: raid array is not clean -- starting > background reconstruction > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: raid5: device sdh1 operational as raid disk 4 > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: raid5: device sdg1 operational as raid disk 5 > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: raid5: device sdf1 operational as raid disk 6 > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: raid5: device sde1 operational as raid disk 7 > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: raid5: device sdd1 operational as raid disk 3 > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: raid5: device sdc1 operational as raid disk 2 > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: raid5: device sda1 operational as raid disk 0 > Mar 17 10:45:24 snap27 kernel: raid5: cannot start dirty degraded > array for md0 So where is 'disk 1' ?? Presumably it should be 'sdb1'. Does that drive exist? Is is marked for auto-detect like the others? NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
