Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday April 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Neil Brown wrote:
>>> This problem is very hard to solve inside the kernel.
>>> The partitions will not be visible until the array is opened *after*
>>> it has been created. Making the partitions visible before that would
>>> be possible, but would be very easy.
>>>
>>> I think the best solution is Mike's solution which is to simply
>>> open/close the array after it has been assembled. I will make sure
>>> this is in the next release of mdadm.
>>>
>>> Note that you can still access the partitions even though they do not
>>> appear in /proc/partitions. Any attempt to access and of them will
>>> make them all appear in /proc/partitions. But I understand there is
>>> sometimes value in seeing them before accessing them.
>>>
>>> NeilBrown
>> Um. Are you sure?
>
> "Works for me".
Lucky you ;)
> What happens if you
> blockdev --rereadpt /dev/md_d0
> ?? It probably works then.
Well, that's probably the same as my BLKRRPART ioctl so I guess yes.
[confirmed - yes, but blockdev seems to do it twice - I get 2 kernel messages]
> It sounds like someone is deliberately removing all the partition
> info.
Gremlins?
> Can you try this patch and see if it reports anyone calling
> '2' on md_d0 ??
Nope, not being called at all.
teak:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md_d0 --auto=parts /dev/sd[bcdef]1
mdadm: /dev/md_d0 has been started with 5 drives.
dmesg:
md: bind<sdc1>
md: bind<sdd1>
md: bind<sdb1>
md: bind<sdf1>
md: bind<sde1>
raid5: device sde1 operational as raid disk 0
raid5: device sdf1 operational as raid disk 4
raid5: device sdb1 operational as raid disk 3
raid5: device sdd1 operational as raid disk 2
raid5: device sdc1 operational as raid disk 1
raid5: allocated 5236kB for md_d0
raid5: raid level 5 set md_d0 active with 5 out of 5 devices, algorithm 2
RAID5 conf printout:
--- rd:5 wd:5
disk 0, o:1, dev:sde1
disk 1, o:1, dev:sdc1
disk 2, o:1, dev:sdd1
disk 3, o:1, dev:sdb1
disk 4, o:1, dev:sdf1
md_d0: bitmap initialized from disk: read 1/1 pages, set 0 bits, status: 0
created bitmap (10 pages) for device md_d0
teak:~# mount /media
mount: special device /dev/md_d0p1 does not exist
no dmesg
teak:~# blockdev --rereadpt /dev/md_d0
dmesg:
md_d0: p1 p2
md_d0: p1 p2
did I mention 2.6.20.7 and mdadm v2.5.6 and udev
I'd be happy if I've done something wrong...
anyway, more config data...
teak:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md_d0
/dev/md_d0:
Version : 01.02.03
Creation Time : Mon Apr 23 15:13:35 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 1250241792 (1192.32 GiB 1280.25 GB)
Device Size : 625120896 (298.08 GiB 320.06 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 5
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Intent Bitmap : Internal
Update Time : Tue Apr 24 12:49:26 2007
State : active
Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 5
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Name : media
UUID : f7835ba6:e38b6feb:c0cd2e2d:3079db59
Events : 25292
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 65 0 active sync /dev/sde1
1 8 33 1 active sync /dev/sdc1
2 8 49 2 active sync /dev/sdd1
5 8 17 3 active sync /dev/sdb1
4 8 81 4 active sync /dev/sdf1
teak:~# cat /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
DEVICE partitions
ARRAY /dev/md_d0 auto=part level=raid5 num-devices=5
UUID=f7835ba6:e38b6feb:c0cd2e2d:3079db59
MAILADDR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
