Hi all !

I promised to show off RAID on a friend's box.   Ok, so we set up
2.2.3 with corrosponding patches on his box with the following
hardware:
2 x IBM UltraStar 9ES 4.5 GB U2W
    Adaptec 2940 UW
    AMD K6 - 200 MHz
    64 MB RAM

Each disk gives us around 11 MB/s using hdparm -t /dev/sd[ab]

If we run  hdparm -t /dev/sda & hdparm -t /dev/sdb,  (two hdparm's
concurrently) we get roughly 8.5 MB/s from each disk,  a total of
17 MB/s.

This is the same number which I've seen on my own machine (dual PPro,
same controller, same disks), when running RAID-0.  All as we would 
have expected.

However, when we set up /dev/md0,  a RAID-0 device between the two
disks, (in a configuration similar to what I've run myself),  we get
around 10 MB/s from the md0 device.     --   Less that we can get 
from one single disk.


I guess it can't be the SCSI configuration/driver/bus/termination/etc.
because when we run two concurrent hdparm's on the disks, we get excellent
performance.

Also, I guess that it can't be the RAID configuration, because we tried 
different chunk-sizes,  and I read the HOWTO    ;)

And finally, I guess it can't be the RAID drivers, because they have no 
K6 specific code (from what I could see).

This boils down to;  there is nothing wrong, but it still doesn't work 
as we would have expected it to.

Does anyone have a clue about what could be going on ??     The main 
difference between my own box which ran a similar configuration for long
time seems to be that this box is a K6.    Anyone running raid0 on similar 
configurations with a K6 CPU ?

Thanks,

-- 
................................................................
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:

Reply via email to