On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, A James Lewis wrote: > 20 to 30 mins is a long time, but it's to be expected for an unclean > shutdown.... > > What journalling filesystem are we thinking of? Hopefully we don't have > to loose the advantages we have built up the ext2..... perhaps it will be > ext3? Stephen Tweedie is working on the journalling extensions. [not sure what the current status is, he had a working prototype end of last year.] AFAIK, these extensions will not destroy anything we have with ext2fs, they are (as usual) optional. I'd call it ext3fs too because the changes themselves are bigger than ext2fs itself, and together with all the other upcoming 2.3 features (ACLs, trees, compression, etc.) it will be significantly different from 'classic' ext2fs, but it's up to Stephen ... -- mingo
- fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Benno Senoner
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Alvin Oga
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Alvin Starr
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Malcolm Beattie
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Richard Jones
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? A James Lewis
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ... Richard Jones
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ... MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arr... Stephen C. Tweedie
- benefits of journaling for soft R... Benno Senoner
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: benefits of journalin... Dan Hollis
- Re: benefits of journalin... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: benefits of journalin... Benno Senoner
- Re: benefits of journalin... Billy Harvey
- Re: benefits of journalin... Matti Aarnio
- Re: benefits of journalin... Malcolm Beattie
- Re: benefits of journalin... Dr. Michael Weller