Hi, On Mon, 8 Feb 1999 14:14:28 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alvin Oga) said: > hi benno > I have a hardware raid controller running off a P2-200 > with 64Gb of disk...99% full... and it takes > about 45 min to e2fsck it when it goes down dirty... > and takes about 10 min to mount it if it's clean > - think software raids would be worst ? No, because for heavy read loads like fsck, the raid stuff, whether software or hardware, really doesn't have any work to do. It's the raw disk array bandwidth and seek time which counts most. --Stephen
- fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Benno Senoner
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Alvin Oga
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Alvin Starr
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Malcolm Beattie
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? Richard Jones
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ? A James Lewis
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ... Richard Jones
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arrays ... MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: fsck performance on large RAID arr... Stephen C. Tweedie
- benefits of journaling for soft R... Benno Senoner
- Re: benefits of journaling fo... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: benefits of journalin... Dan Hollis