Michael Cunningham wrote: > Unfortunatly on reads on a raid 1 array i am seeing about what it would > be for a single drive:( definatly not even close to 2x. I was wrong. I just went back and looked at my tests, and I was recalling raid 0 tests. My raid 1 tests show this as well, no benefit from a second drive. tom
- Re: raid performance? good? Thomas Waldmann
- Re: raid performance? good? Jakob Østergaard
- Re: raid performance? good? Michael Cunningham
- Re: raid performance? good? Jakob Østergaard
- Re: raid performance? good? Mika Kuoppala
- Re: raid performance? good? Jakob Østergaard
- Re: raid performance? good? Thomas Waldmann
- Re: raid performance? good? Jakob Østergaard
- RE: raid performance? good? Tom Livingston
- RE: raid performance? good? Michael Cunningham
- RE: raid performance? good? Tom Livingston
- RE: raid performance? good? Stanley, Jeremy
- RE: raid performance? good? Mika Kuoppala
- RE: raid performance? good? Andy Poling