On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Jan Edler wrote: > > My tests indicate UDMA performs favorably with ultrascsi, at about 1/6 the > > cost. Cost is often a big factor. > I wasn't advising against IDE, only against the use of slaves. Here we agree :D 1 device per channel. (When will any vendors implement IDE disconnect? the spec has existed for ages.) > With UDMA-33 or -66, masters work quite well, > if you can deal with the other constraints that I mentioned > (cable length, PCI slots, etc). Get an Abit BP6 and you have 4 onboard udma channels, and 6 PCI slots. :D Cable length is not so much a pain as the number of cables. Of course with scsi you want multiple channels anyway for performance, so the situation is very similar to ide. A cable mess. -Dan
- Re: large ide raid system John Burton
- Re: large ide raid system Thomas Davis
- Re: large ide raid system Thomas Davis
- Re: large ide raid system James Manning
- Re: large ide raid system Brian Grossman
- Re: large ide raid system Thomas Davis
- Re: large ide raid system Gregory Leblanc
- Re: large ide raid system Jan Edler
- Re: large ide raid system Dan Hollis
- Re: large ide raid system Jan Edler
- Re: large ide raid system Dan Hollis
- Re: large ide raid system Gregory Leblanc
- Ribbon Cabling (was Re: large ide ... Andy Poling
- Re: Ribbon Cabling (was Re: la... James Manning
- Re: Ribbon Cabling (was Re: la... Anton Ivanov
- Re: Ribbon Cabling (was Re: la... Bohumil Chalupa
- Re: Ribbon Cabling (was Re: la... James Manning
- Re: Ribbon Cabling (was Re: la... Chris Mauritz
- Re: large ide raid system D. Lance Robinson
- Re: large ide raid system Thomas Waldmann
- benchmark results + questions Holger Kiehl