Hi folks, I did some tests comparing a k6-2 500 vs a celeron 400 - on a raid5 system - found some interesting results Raid5 write performance of the celeron is almost 50% better than the k6-2. Is this b/c of mmx (as james manning suggested) or b/c of the FPU? I used tiobench in sizes of > than 3X my memory size on both systems - memory and drives of both systems were identical. Thanks -sv
- Re: celeron vs k6-2 Seth Vidal
- Re: celeron vs k6-2 Kristian Soerensen
- Re: celeron vs k6-2 James Manning
- Re: celeron vs k6-2 Seth Vidal
- Re: celeron vs k6-2 Stephen Waters
- Re: celeron vs k6-2 Seth Vidal
- RE: celeron vs k6-2 Gregory Leblanc
- RE: celeron vs k6-2 Seth Vidal
- RE: celeron vs k6-2 Dan Hollis
- My benchmarks Douglas Egan
- RE: celeron vs k6-2 Cefiar