On Jul 21, 10:57am, Malcolm Beattie wrote:
} Subject: Is the raid1readbalance patch production ready?

> Is the raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2 patch (when applied against a
> 2.2.16+linux-2.2.16-raid-B2 kernel) rock-solid and production
> quality? Can I trust 750GB of users' email to it? Is it guaranteed
> to behave the same during failure modes that the non-patched RAID
> code does? Is anyone using it heavily in a production system?
> (Not that I expect any other answer except maybe for a resounding
> "probably" :-)

Here's one probably.... :-)

We are using the read-balancing patch as part of our standard patchset
to 2.2.16.  We are currently using it on about 20 production servers
with varying degress of business.

I haven't heard a twerp out of it including through the
failure of one side of a mirror on a moderately busy file server.

> --Malcolm

}-- End of excerpt from Malcolm Beattie

As always,
Dr. G.W. Wettstein, Ph.D.   Enjellic Systems Development, LLC.
4206 N. 19th Ave.           Specializing in information infra-structure
Fargo, ND  58102            development.
PH: 701-281-4950            WWW: http://www.enjellic.com
FAX: 701-281-3949           EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"IMPORTANT:  The entire physical universe, including this message, may
one day collapse back into an infinitesimally small space.  Should
another universe subsequently re-emerge, the existence of this message
in that universe cannot be guaranteed."
                                -- Ryan Tucker

Reply via email to