Tung, Chien Tin wrote:
I think this is an extremely strong argument against the patch that
started the thread. Breaking soft iWARP seems a fatal flaw.
- R.
I agree.
The patch or SoftiWARP can be reworked to allow the whole iWARP family
to coexist. It is a matter of agreeing on which path to take.
I agree with this too! :) My only reason for stating I agree with
Roland/Bernard is that reserving a port in the rdma-cm definitely breaks
software iwarp, so we need to rethink this whole thing in light of
software iwarp.
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
