Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 02:20:21PM -0500, Steve Wise wrote:

I guess it should be using the oif from the cm_id?

Not sure exactly what is best here :|

So, looks like there is a larger cleanup here, if the RDMACM holds the
dst and has functions to freshen it/track it then the iwarp driver
should rely on the RDMACM to manage the dst..

In other words, moving the dst handling from iwch_cm into RDMACM would
also mostly satisfy why Or is trying to do.

Does that make sense to you Steve?
Yes, in principle. If you want to move all this into the RDMACM, then an interface must be devised so the drivers can tell the RDMACM that an offload connection is failing and probably needs ND/NUD done. Or some such feedback interface. And the RDMACM needs to call the devices if something changes like routing redirects I guess.

I think if RDMACM manages the dst and lets the devices access it then
all the existing netdev infrastructure for poking at a dst should be
available to the device?


Yes. But I'm not sure exactly how the logic I described previous for cxgb* would be handled in the design being ironed out here.



You might want the device to specify whether it wants the rdma-cm to
handle all this or not.  Some devices might be better able to handle
this stuff.

?? either you integrate with netdev in this area or your device is
broken :( :( Ie doing ND under the covers is broken, it breaks corner
case netdev ND management stuff like static ND entries. Same for ICMP
redirects, same for route lookups and caching, same for route PMTU
.. :(

IMHO, going down the path of integration is all or nothing, you don't
get to support things like Amasso doing seperate ND while providing
much fuller integration for cxgb. That just creates a huge complex
mess for end users.



Guess you'd have to remove the Ammasso driver then. ;)


How does the cxgb3 driver know when to update the HW if the dst/nd
entries change?

It uses netevents.  See nb_callback() in
drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_offload.c.

What about route table changes?


Currently route table changes don't have any affect on existing connections. Only new connections would be affected.


Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to