On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
<jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
>> <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:26:26PM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> >
>> >> > I don't think there is really any free interpretation here. For
>> >> > everything but a switch localPortNum must always reflect the port that
>> >> > portGUID is associated with.
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately, this is not always true due to the funky cross (CA and
>> >> router) port PortInfo queries (but I don't think that query style is
>> >> used by OpenSM for CA or router ports but allowed in IBA)...
>> >
>> > What part of the spec are you referring to here?
>>
>> IBA 1.2.1 v1 p.830 line 9 the otherwise sentence.
>
> That is talking about PortInfo. NodeInfo does not support that
> attribute modifier language, my patch affects SANodeRecord.

My bad :-( I was thinking of PortInfoRecord, not NodeRecord, for some reason...

-- Hal

> Jason
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to