On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:47:48PM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > >> <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:26:26PM -0500, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > > >> >> > I don't think there is really any free interpretation here. For > >> >> > everything but a switch localPortNum must always reflect the port that > >> >> > portGUID is associated with. > >> >> > >> >> Unfortunately, this is not always true due to the funky cross (CA and > >> >> router) port PortInfo queries (but I don't think that query style is > >> >> used by OpenSM for CA or router ports but allowed in IBA)... > >> > > >> > What part of the spec are you referring to here? > >> > >> IBA 1.2.1 v1 p.830 line 9 the otherwise sentence. > > > > That is talking about PortInfo. NodeInfo does not support that > > attribute modifier language, my patch affects SANodeRecord. > > My bad :-( I was thinking of PortInfoRecord, not NodeRecord, for some > reason...
No worries, what do you think about my patch, does it align with what IBA intends? Thanks, Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
