On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:52:30PM -0700, parav.pan...@emulex.com wrote: > > This can be used to force 32bit alignment in amd64 code in order to match > > definitions in 32bit userspace. > > For new things it would make sense to force 64bit alignment of 64bit fields > > for 32bit code. > > o.k. so I'll use aligned attribute to align user-kernel interface > data structure to 8 byte boundary. That should work for 32-bit and > 64-bit user and kernel space and does't hurt performance either?
If the structure is only for user/kernel interfacing then it is much better to add explicit padding fields to naturally place 64 bit quantities on an 8 byte alignment than to mess with gcc specific attributes (user space has a much wide choice of compilers). This was David's second suggestion. Better to do this now before the driver is accepted :) Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html