> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com] > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 2:28 AM > To: Pandit, Parav > Cc: david.lai...@aculab.com; rol...@purestorage.com; linux- > r...@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ocrdma: Driver for Emulex OneConnect RDMA > adapter > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:52:30PM -0700, parav.pan...@emulex.com > wrote: > > > > This can be used to force 32bit alignment in amd64 code in order to > > > match definitions in 32bit userspace. > > > For new things it would make sense to force 64bit alignment of 64bit > > > fields for 32bit code. > > > > o.k. so I'll use aligned attribute to align user-kernel interface data > > structure to 8 byte boundary. That should work for 32-bit and 64-bit > > user and kernel space and does't hurt performance either? > > If the structure is only for user/kernel interfacing then it is much better to > add explicit padding fields to naturally place 64 bit quantities on an 8 byte > alignment than to mess with gcc specific attributes (user space has a much > wide choice of compilers). > > This was David's second suggestion. Better to do this now before the driver is > accepted :) > o.k. I'll align them to naturally 8 byte boundary.
> Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html