> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gunthorpe [mailto:jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 2:28 AM
> To: Pandit, Parav
> Cc: david.lai...@aculab.com; rol...@purestorage.com; linux-
> r...@vger.kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ocrdma: Driver for Emulex OneConnect RDMA
> adapter
> 
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:52:30PM -0700, parav.pan...@emulex.com
> wrote:
> 
> > > This can be used to force 32bit alignment in amd64 code in order to
> > > match definitions in 32bit userspace.
> > > For new things it would make sense to force 64bit alignment of 64bit
> > > fields for 32bit code.
> >
> > o.k. so I'll use aligned attribute to align user-kernel interface data
> > structure to 8 byte boundary.  That should work for 32-bit and 64-bit
> > user and kernel space and does't hurt performance either?
> 
> If the structure is only for user/kernel interfacing then it is much better to
> add explicit padding fields to naturally place 64 bit quantities on an 8 byte
> alignment than to mess with gcc specific attributes (user space has a much
> wide choice of compilers).
> 
> This was David's second suggestion. Better to do this now before the driver is
> accepted :)
> 
o.k. I'll align them to naturally 8 byte boundary. 

> Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to