On 5/31/2013 12:44 PM, Line Holen wrote: > On 05/31/13 17:43, Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> On 5/31/2013 10:40 AM, Hefty, Sean wrote: >>>> Are you suggesting to do this in addition to ib_types.h or instead of ? >>>> umad_sm.h seems to hold only a small subset of what's found in >>>> ib_types.h. >>> umad_sm.h was only recently added. >> and there is no release yet with those files. >> >>> I'm suggesting to put the definitions there instead of within the >>> opensm header file, so that the definitions are available to >>> applications other than opensm. >> My preference would be in addition to rather than instead of. In the >> future once there is libibumad release in the field for some time with >> these headers, then OpenSM can migrate definitions as makes sense. >> >> -- Hal > OK, so shall I send a v4 patch with both header files or can I do a > second separate patch > for the umad_sm.h file ?
>From my perspective, a second patch for umad_sm.h would suffice. Thanks. -- Hal > Line > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
