On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Or Gerlitz <or.gerl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Roland, after applying a small fix which was sent to you by Matan on > Sep 22nd + another tiny fix by Yann to Matan's patch (the two can be > surely squashed into one small patch), things are working OK. Yann is > suggesting to enhance them to work and look even better and for some > reasons (life) he didn't get to do that on the 3-4 months the patches > spent on the list and went through review of Sean/Jason/Shawn and you > (RD). I don't see how/why you use the term half-baked here.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, Yann's suggestion for enhancement is not user/kernel ABI compatible with what is in the tree now. Given that we should really try to find an ABI that lasts for a long time, and that we already have a proposal to improve things, shouldn't we hold off on freezing the new ABI for one more kernel cycle? - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
