On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:39:13AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > >> Let’s take this as a starting point. If there are other patches >> people think should make 4.1, please bring them to my attention and >> I’ll add them for review and possible addition to the list. >> >> git://github.com/dledford/linux.git for-4.1 > > I noticed a few patches didn't get Reviewed-By's etc from the mailing > list annotated..
Every patch need not have a Reviewed-By annotation, it's perfectly up to the maintainer judgement to make sure there was either consensus, or that he/she accepts that despite (say) one person not liking them -- here the 2nd type doesn't exist -- as Doug note spelled, these are the patches >> My IPoIB changes was reviewed by Erez >> Erez’s IPoIB changes was reviewed by Doug >> Or’s mlx4 changes these are Yishai's patches, driver ones, we applied your feedback BTW >> Sagi’s iSER changes posted by the driver maintainer, a co-maintainer (me) reviewed them >> The two patch fixup to the CVE issue have reviewed by >> A few other miscellaneous patches etc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
