On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 11:17 -0400, ira.weiny wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:54:59AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 00:13 -0400, ira.weiny wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:40:21PM -0400, ira.we...@intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Doug, Jason,
> > > 
> > > Were there any issues with these clean ups?
> > 
> > I haven't gotten to them yet.  Your 14 patch OPA addition and this were
> > on my queue for getting to relatively soonish.  I *thought* this touched
> > stuff that your 14 patch set also touched and so thought it needed to be
> > on top of it, so that's part of the reason why I hadn't even looked at
> > it yet (these emails are part of the "still new and unread" emails in my
> > Inbox that seem to never get to 0 ;-).
> 
> I understand.
> 
> > 
> > > I think they stand on their own but I can add them to the OPA series if 
> > > you
> > > prefer.
> > 
> > Double check that they stand on their own.  If they do, I'll review them
> > separately.
> 
> They do stand on their own and they are improvements even without the OPA 
> code.
> 
> They became precursors to the next OPA series because I am changing some core
> functions.  In order to declare parameters of those core functions const the
> entire call chain required updating.  Rather than mix that call chain clean up
> with the new OPA code I felt it would be easier to review these as separate
> clean up patches.
> 
> If this is an unorthodox procedure, is there a better way to handle something
> like this?

No, you did it fine.  However, if this is to be a precursor to your next
OPA patchset, then it is helpful to mention that in the cover letter
(helps me make sure I do things in the right order).

> As more and more clean up becomes necessary in the core I don't want the OPA
> changes to become a huge patch series which is unwieldy to review and mostly
> cleanup.  (If you count Michaels changes the "clean up" to the core which OPA
> now relies on count for more patches then the actual OPA changes.) I'm trying
> to reduce the review workload by making clear which patches are clean up vs
> actual OPA code.

Yep, makes perfect sense.

> Apologies,
> Ira
> 
> > 
> > > Ira
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > In order to support some of Jason's comments to add const to the 
> > > > functions I am
> > > > adding for OPA the following patches clean up the call trees of the 
> > > > currently
> > > > defined functions.
> > > > 
> > > > They stand on their own as clean up patches.  Therefore, I am 
> > > > submitting them
> > > > separately from the OPA patches.
> > > > 
> > > > Ira Weiny (3):
> > > >   IB/core: Add const to RDMA helpers
> > > >   IB/core: Add const to device process_mad
> > > >   IB/core: Add const to agent_send_response
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c                |  4 +--
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/core/agent.c               |  8 +++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/core/agent.h               |  4 +--
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c               |  8 +++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c               |  9 ++++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/amso1100/c2_provider.c  |  6 ++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb3/iwch_provider.c   |  6 ++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/provider.c        |  5 ++--
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_iverbs.h      |  4 +--
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_sqp.c         |  4 +--
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_mad.c       |  8 +++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_verbs.h     |  6 ++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/mad.c              | 21 ++++++++-------
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/mlx4_ib.h          |  8 +++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mad.c              |  8 +++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h          |  8 +++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_cmd.c       |  4 +--
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_cmd.h       |  4 +--
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_dev.h       |  6 ++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mthca/mthca_mad.c       | 10 +++----
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/nes_verbs.c         |  4 +--
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ocrdma/ocrdma_ah.c      |  6 ++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ocrdma/ocrdma_ah.h      |  6 ++---
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_mad.c           | 10 +++----
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_verbs.h         |  4 +--
> > > >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/mad.c |  2 +-
> > > >  include/linux/mlx5/driver.h                   |  2 +-
> > > >  include/rdma/ib_addr.h                        |  6 ++---
> > > >  include/rdma/ib_cache.h                       |  8 +++---
> > > >  include/rdma/ib_verbs.h                       | 39 
> > > > ++++++++++++++-------------
> > > >  30 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 1.8.2
> > > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
> >               GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
> > 
> 
> 


-- 
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
              GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to