On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 11:32 -0400, ira.weiny wrote: > > > > > > Double check that they stand on their own. If they do, I'll review them > > > separately. > > > > They do stand on their own and they are improvements even without the OPA > > code. > > After responding to this email I found a 0-day build email which shows a > build warnings on this patch building ehca on PPC: > > IB/core: Add const to device process_mad > > I'm not sure why but sometimes my 0-day build results are delayed for quite > some time? I'm guessing the servers prioritize kernel.org over github > accounts??? Or I'm just doing something wrong... :-/
I've seen that too. I can't tell you what the issue is.
However, I should take this to mean there is a both a v2 of this series,
and a new OPA series on the way?
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
