> >>> +/* Local Service Reversible attribute */ struct
> >>> +rdma_nla_ls_reversible {
> >>> + __u32 reversible;
> >>> +};
> >>
> >> Isn't __u8 sufficient for reversible ?
> > Certainly enough. However, reversible is __u32 in struct
> ib_user_path_rec and int in struct ib_sa_path_rec.
>
> OK; I hadn't double checked there. So it's "inherited" from those
> reversible definitions.
I don't think we need to adhere to the sizes defined in other structures. I
agree with Hal's original comment. A __u8 here seems sufficient, unless we
want to introduce some bit fields.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
