> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-rdma-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sagi Grimberg > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 8:23 AM > To: Steve Wise; Hefty, Sean; dledf...@redhat.com > Cc: r...@mellanox.com; sa...@mellanox.com; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; > jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com; infinipath; > e...@mellanox.com; ogerl...@mellanox.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] RDMA/core: transport-independent access flags > > On 7/2/2015 4:17 PM, Steve Wise wrote: > > On 7/2/2015 1:22 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >> On 6/30/2015 8:10 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote: > >>>> I suggest to start consolidating to ib_create_mr() that receives an > >>>> extensible ib_mr_init_attr and additional attributes can be mr_roles > >>>> and mr_attrs. > >>> > >>> I think this makes sense, but does it really help? > >>> If the end result is that the app and providers basically > >>> end up switching on mr_attr::type, we end up reducing the > >>> number of APIs, but the code complexity remains the same. > >>> > >> > >> I think it will reduce code complexity. First, the callers > >> will have a single API to allocate a memory key. I'm not sure why you > >> say that app needs to switch on mr::type, it knows which type it wants. > >> > > > > I dont see how doing this is less complex: > > > > attr = FASTREG > > mr = create_mr(attr) > > > > vs: > > > > mr = lloc_fast_reg_mr() > > The simplification is that you can facilitate changes like your > mr_roles and any other things we may want to add to mr allocation > easily instead of suggesting wrappers over wrappers over wrappers. > > This is why I suggested it in the first place. >
Regardless of have one create_mr() or having create_sig_mr(), create_fast_reg_mr(), get_dma_mr(), we'll still need to define the roles/attributes to make them transport independent, and we'll still need to have an entry point that will compute access_flags given roles and attributes to be used when posting frmrs... I don't see wrappers over wrappers over wrappers. I'm not really opposed to creating a single entry point, but rather I'm not really seeing vast utility of doing so. Anybody else have an opinion? Steve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
