On 7/22/2015 12:22 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
On 7/22/2015 7:58 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 09:55:02AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
+struct ib_mr *mlx4_ib_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd,
+ enum ib_mr_type mr_type,
+ u32 max_entries,
+ u32 flags)
+{
This is just a copy of mlx4_ib_alloc_fast_reg_mr with
this added:
+ if (mr_type != IB_MR_TYPE_FAST_REG || flags)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
Are all the driver updates the same? It looks like it.
I'd suggest shortening this patch series, have the core provide the
wrapper immediately:
struct ib_mr *ib_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd,
{
...
if (pd->device->alloc_mr) {
mr = pd->device->alloc_mr(pd, mr_type, max_entries, flags);
} else {
if (mr_type != IB_MR_TYPE_FAST_REG || flags ||
!ib_dev->alloc_fast_reg_mr)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
mr = pd->device->alloc_fast_reg_mr(..);
}
}
Then go through the series to remove ib_alloc_fast_reg_mr
Then go through one series to migrate the drivers from
alloc_fast_reg_mr to alloc_mr
Then entirely drop alloc_fast_reg_mr from the driver API.
That should be shorter and easier to read the driver diffs, which is
the major change here.
Yea, it would be better...
43 patches overflows my stack ;) I agree with Jason's suggestion.
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
