On 08/13/2015 01:54 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 07:24:44PM -0700, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> That makes sense, but you already Acked the change that breaks Lustre,
>> and it's going in through the NFS tree. Are you changing that to a NAK?

No.  Lustre fits in my "languishing in the staging tree" category.

> It seems like Doug was mostly concened about to be removed drivers.
> I defintively refuse to fix Lustre for anything I tough because it's
> such a giant mess with uses just about every major subsystem in
> an incorrect way.
> 
> Doug:  was your mail a request to fix up the two de-staged drivers?
> I'm happy to do that if you're fine with the patch in general.  amso1100
> should be trivial anyway, while ipath is a mess, just like the new intel
> driver with the third copy of the soft ib stack.

Correct.


-- 
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
              GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to