On 08/11/2015 04:50 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 08/01/2015 01:05 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: >> On 07/31/2015 07:14 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:04:35PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> >>>> With only patches 1/12 and 8/12 applied my test passes. >>> >>> Thanks Bart! >>> >>> If you like, I can try and work on #9 (no promises :(), but I think >>> I'll need some way to test it here. >>> >>> Do you by chance have a straightforward recipe to setup SRP and SRPT >>> on two Linux's for this simple purpose? >>> >>> Doug, just drop #9 'IB/srp: Do not create an all physical insecure >>> rkey by default' please, thanks. >> >> I've pulled in the series for 4.3. I've included patch #9, but that's >> on the understanding that if it can't be fixed before the initial pull >> request, I'll drop it at that time. I have the resources to test this, >> so I can work on it, and that factors into my path forward here. > > Hi Doug, > > Do you feel comfortable enough to queue the nine patches that replace > Jason's patch #9 for kernel v4.3 (see also > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.rdma/28153/focus=28419) or > would you rather prefer to take out patch #9 and queue these nine > patches for kernel v4.4 ? Please advise.
I was planning on queueing up the 9 replacement patches.
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
