Hi Simon,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:20:11AM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> Renesas R8A7792 SoC is a member of the R-Car gen2 family and so has CPG...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com>
>
> I think the prefix of this patch should be "clk: shmobile: rcar-gen2: "
Almost, "clk: renesas: rcar-gen: " ;-)
> I apologise if I have missed a discussion of this topic or if my analysis
> is wrong for some reason but I am curious to know what the intended way
> is for the rcar-gen2 CPG driver to handle differences in the availability
> of clocks across different SoCs.
>
> My possibly naïve expectation is that the implementation would use compat
> strings. But as it stands it appears that all clocks supported by the
> driver are available for all SoCs. This does not seem to reflect the
> documentation (v2.00).
Differentiaton is not done using compat strings, but using clock-output-names.
The driver only instantiates the clocks that are listed there.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
