A seperate bus_type instance is not required for Exynos5. The existing bus_type
instance used with Exynos4 is sufficient for both Exynos4 and Exynos5. This
also solves issue of uninitialized usage of exynos4_subsys in Exynos4 power
management code that is reused for Exynos5 also.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abra...@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c | 19 ++-----------------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
index e9e353b..636d5f8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
@@ -557,25 +557,13 @@ struct bus_type exynos4_subsys = {
.dev_name = "exynos4-core",
};
-struct bus_type exynos5_subsys = {
- .name = "exynos5-core",
- .dev_name = "exynos5-core",
-};
-
static struct device exynos4_dev = {
.bus = &exynos4_subsys,
};
-static struct device exynos5_dev = {
- .bus = &exynos5_subsys,
-};
-
static int __init exynos_core_init(void)
{
- if (soc_is_exynos5250())
- return subsys_system_register(&exynos5_subsys, NULL);
- else
- return subsys_system_register(&exynos4_subsys, NULL);
+ return subsys_system_register(&exynos4_subsys, NULL);
}
core_initcall(exynos_core_init);
@@ -662,10 +650,7 @@ static int __init exynos_init(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "EXYNOS: Initializing architecture\n");
- if (soc_is_exynos5250())
- return device_register(&exynos5_dev);
- else
- return device_register(&exynos4_dev);
+ return device_register(&exynos4_dev);
}
/* uart registration process */
--
1.6.6.rc2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
