https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198839

--- Comment #4 from doru iorgulescu (doru.iorgules...@gmail.com) ---
Not oficial,
I have tested :
I copy /usr/src/linux-4.14.20/drivers/scsi/megaraid  to
/usr/src/linux-4.9.82/drivers/scsi/megaraid . I compile the kernel 4.9.82
and is OK !
You have the dmesg
Regards,
Doru Iorgulescu


On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:38 AM, <bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org>
wrote:

> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198839
>
> --- Comment #3 from Sumit Saxena (sumit.sax...@broadcom.com) ---
> (In reply to doru iorgulescu from comment #2)
> > Created attachment 274275 [details]
> > attachment-17443-0.html
> >
> > Hi,
> > The problem is in kernel 4.9.82
> > #define MEGASAS_VERSION                         "06.811.02.00-rc1"
> > For kernel 4.14.20 is OK
> > #define MEGASAS_VERSION                         "07.702.06.00-rc1"
>
> ok, now with
> #define MEGASAS_VERSION                         "07.702.06.00-rc1"
> backported to kernel 4.9.82, issue is resolved in kernel 4.9.82, right ?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sumit
> >
> > 5e:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID Tri-Mode
> > SAS3508 (rev 01)
> >         Subsystem: Intel Corporation MegaRAID Tri-Mode SAS3508
> (Integrated
> > RAID Module RMSP3CD080F)
> >         Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 36, NUMA node 0
> >         Memory at 38fffff00000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=1M]
> >         Memory at 38ffffe00000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=1M]
> >         Memory at b8800000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
> >         I/O ports at 8000 [size=256]
> >         Expansion ROM at <ignored> [disabled]
> >         Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
> >         Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
> >         Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
> >         Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=128 Masked-
> >         Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data
> >         Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
> >         Capabilities: [148] Power Budgeting <?>Regards,
> >         Capabilities: [158] Alternative Routing-ID Interpretation (ARI)
> >         Capabilities: [168] #19
> >         Capabilities: [254] #16
> >         Capabilities: [284] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0002 Rev=1
> > Len=100 <?>
> >         Capabilities: [384] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1
> > Len=038 <?>
> >         Capabilities: [3bc] #15
> >         Kernel driver in use: megaraid_sas
> >         Kernel modules: megaraid_sas
> >
> > Regards,
> > Doru Iorgulescu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:07 AM, <bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198839
> > >
> > > Sumit Saxena (sumit.sax...@broadcom.com) changed:
> > >
> > >            What    |Removed                     |Added
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----------------
> > >                  CC|                            |
> sumit.sax...@broadcom.com
> > >
> > > --- Comment #1 from Sumit Saxena (sumit.sax...@broadcom.com) ---
> > > (In reply to doru iorgulescu from comment #0)
> > > > Created attachment 274257 [details]
> > > > Backport of the Linux MegaRAID driver for SAS based RAID controllers
> > > >
> > > > Backport of the Linux MegaRAID driver for SAS based RAID controllers
> > > >
> > > > backport of the megaraid_sas driver from kernel 4.14.20 to kernel
> 4.9.82
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Hardware:
> > > > DMI: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS
> > > > SE5C620.86B.00.01.0009.101920170742 10/19/2017
> > > >
> > > > I copy /usr/src/linux-4.14.20/drivers/scsi/megaraid  to
> > > > /usr/src/linux-4.9.82/drivers/scsi/megaraid . I compile the kernel
> > > 4.9.82
> > > > and is OK !
> > > > I send dmesg atached.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The problem for original linux kernel 4.9.82 is :
> > > >
> > > > 5e:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID
> Tri-Mode
> > > > SAS3508 (rev 01)
> > > >         Subsystem: Intel Corporation MegaRAID Tri-Mode SAS3508
> > > (Integrated
> > > > RAID Module RMSP3CD080F)
> > > >         Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 36, NUMA node
> 0
> > > >         Memory at 38fffff00000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=1M]
> > > >         Memory at 38ffffe00000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=1M]
> > > >         Memory at b8800000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
> > > >         I/O ports at 8000 [size=256]
> > > >         Expansion ROM at <ignored> [disabled]
> > > >         Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
> > > >         Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
> > > >         Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
> > > >         Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=128 Masked-
> > > >         Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data
> > > >         Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting
> > > >         Capabilities: [148] Power Budgeting <?>Regards,
> > > >         Capabilities: [158] Alternative Routing-ID Interpretation
> (ARI)
> > > >         Capabilities: [168] #19
> > > >         Capabilities: [254] #16
> > > >         Capabilities: [284] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0002
> Rev=1
> > > > Len=100 <?>
> > > >         Capabilities: [384] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001
> Rev=1
> > > > Len=038 <?>
> > > >         Capabilities: [3bc] #15
> > > >         Kernel driver in use: megaraid_sas
> > > >         Kernel modules: megaraid_sas
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Doru Iorgulescu
> > >
> > > Hi Doru,
> > >
> > > I have gone through the attached logs and observed some prints about
> > > hibernation failure.
> > > --
> > > [    3.788370] PM: Starting manual resume from disk
> > > [    3.788375] PM: Hibernation image partition 8:9 present
> > > [    3.788377] PM: Looking for hibernation image.
> > > [    3.788638] PM: Image not found (code -22)
> > > [    3.788640] PM: Hibernation image not present or could not be
> loaded.
> > > --
> > >
> > > Is it the problem you are trying to point ? Please clarify.
> > > Is it regression from 4.14.20 to 4.9.82 due to megaraid_sas driver
> > > backporting
> > > ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sumit
> > >
> > > --
> > > You are receiving this mail because:
> > > You reported the bug.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.
>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Reply via email to