On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Monty wrote:
> >> Am I insane?  Am I the only one who believes that 'stable' means
> >> 'don't randomly fuck with it'?
> >I believe "optional" means "can be disabled completely".
> ...and when a change this large introduces new bugs into the old and
> new implementations?  This is desirable in a 'stable' kernel?

Dont see how it would introduce new bugs into the old implementation since
all the relevant code would be #define'd out by the compiler. That is, if
its configured off, the code simply doesnt exist, and you get the old
implementation, pristine.

-Dan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to