On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Monty wrote: > >Dont see how it would introduce new bugs into the old implementation since > >all the relevant code would be #define'd out by the compiler. That is, if > >its configured off, the code simply doesnt exist, and you get the old > >implementation, pristine. > The previous bug I'm referring to didn't occur in kernel code; it was > introduced by kernel code changes that resulted in a system header > change (and that was the bug). #define, #ifdef... -Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems on recent Linux versio... Richard Gooch
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems on recent Linux versions Joerg Schilling
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems on recent Linux versio... Richard Gooch
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems on recent Linux ve... Monty
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems on recent Linu... Richard Gooch
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems on recent ... Monty
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems on re... Dan Hollis
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Monty
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Dan Hollis
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Monty
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Dan Hollis
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Richard Gooch
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Richard Gooch
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Richard Gooch
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Richard Gooch
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Monty
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems o... Richard Gooch
- No Subject owner-linux-scsi
- Re: WG: AW: cdrecord problems on re... root
