On Friday, July 6 2007 1:25:22 pm Tetsuo Handa wrote: > So, recv() returning -EPERM after dequing this message is acceptable?
Maybe :) I would suggest sending a patchset to the list with both the LSM interface change patch (the one we have been discussing) as well as your actual LSM/personal-firewall patch. You may also want to CC other relevant lists (based on this discussion netdev comes to mind) on your posting as they should probably review your suggested changes too. -- paul moore linux security @ hp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
