Hello,

in updating the documetation http://www.friedhoff.org/posixfilecaps.html
I noticed a change in the behavior.

There was the behavior, when the extended attribute capability was
present but with empty sets, even a suid-0-bit binary was not having
the right to request a call for which capabilities in-kernel are
defined. suid-0-bit ping with an empty capability set provoked an EPERM

Now, when the extended attribute is present but empty and for ping - as
an example - cap_net_raw is not granted, root-power overrules the lack
of the necessary capability.

Shall the presents of file capability constrain root power or shall
root power overrule file capability?

Cheers
Chris

--------------------
Chris Friedhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to