On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:17:22 +0000 Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri 2008-02-01 20:07:01, James Morris wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > Really? I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led > > > to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers > > > which > > > indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every > > > conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it. > > > > FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see > > any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge. > > > > You can add my reviewed-by. > > > > I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm. > > I don't thing -mm baking helps here. People playing with -mm are not > the ones trying to hack your box. > That's for sure. Whitebox testing and really really careful review is our best shot with this stuff. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
