Timothy MacDonald wrote:
>
> The local NT-head ( and decision maker ) here in the office is basing his
> opinion of linux off a sidebar in Windows NT magazine. I think that his
> information is biased and misleading, if not wrong, but I really don't know
> enough about the Linux kernel to argue against it. I have included parts of
> the article below. If someone more knowledgable than I could take a look and
> tell me whether it is correct or not I really would appreciate it!
>
Tim, the main thing to remember about the difference between Linux and
NT or other borg viruses is this.
When you have a problem with linux, you play with it and more often than
not you come to the realizaion that , boy I'm dumb.
When you have a problem with a borg virus, you play with it and more
often than not you come to the realization that, boy this software
(*^(*&^. Well feel free to fill in you personal favorite explative.
Remember, It's a terrible thing to infect an intel processor with a borg
virus.
Tom Watson.
Good archive of Linux articles.
http://odin.appliedtheory.com/linux-activism/
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
