Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But i think it's safe to say that in any other case explicit > scheduling-control is a loss. It depends. If you have several multi-threaded applications, scheduling all of the same application threads at the same time can be a big win, especially if they synchronize a lot (no 'unneeded' wait if the unlocking thread has not cpu). Gang scheduling was made for that. This necessitates some kind of processor sets. I think this functionnality is available on Irix on Origin/2000. Regards, david -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/ Linux SMP HOWTO: http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/smp-howto/ Opinions expressed here are only mine. - Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/smp-howto/ To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- smp monitoring & managing Andrew Pavlis
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Johan Kullstam
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Andrew Pavlis
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Marco Aldinucci
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Marco Aldinucci
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Ingo Molnar
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Herbert Wengatz 42850
- Re: smp monitoring & managing T V Govind
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Ingo Molnar
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Artur Skawina
- Re: smp monitoring & managing David Mentr�
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Alan Watson
- Re: smp monitoring & manag... Ingo Molnar
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Rod Moten
- Re: smp monitoring & managing David Mentr�
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Borislav Deianov
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Herbert Wengatz 42850
- Re: smp monitoring & managing T V Govind
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Borislav Deianov
- Re: smp monitoring & managing Andrew Pavlis
