Wouldn't this be kind of like upping the nice value on the processes? I
haven't checked out your script, but isn't that what nice is all about,
dictating priority of processes/user jobs??
BTW, if you could, please reply only to the group, I keep getting dual and
quad messages. I like dual and quad processors, but not multiple messages
(I receive 71 messages today!!)....
How hard is it to cut the [EMAIL PROTECTED] and paste it into the
to field? 5 seconds of work at the most....
-Andy
Borislav Deianov wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Ok, I understand that the kernal manages both the process
> > distribution. But let's say I am running 10 game servers (for
> > instance) which do not support smp. Does Linux-smp distribute the
> > load over both processors? Or does it assign 1 proc here 1 proc
> > there, etc? Is there a way for me to help Linux :0] ?
>
> <plug>
> One thing you might want to do in the 10 game servers scenario is
> control how much CPU time each server is allowed to use. You can do
> this with my hierarchical fair scheduler (link below). For example,
> you can say things like "this group of processes is twice as important
> as that group" and it'll be guaranteed twice as much CPU time. Within
> each group processes are scheduled by the standard scheduler.
> </plug>
>
> This is not exactly what you asked for but it's similar in that it
> allows you more control over the scheduling.
>
> Regards,
> Borislav
> http://people.cornell.edu/pages/bdd2/hsfq/
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/smp-howto/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
