Re: pipes -- BAD news

[Ingo Molnar]

On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Alan Watson wrote:

> > could you compare achieved performance, not raw paralellizm
> > numbers?
> 
> Yes, I agree this is the important measure, but the kernel
> still fails. The elapsed times are 5.3 seconds with the rsh
> trick and 9.5 seconds without.

ok, thats bad indeed. Do you see the same problem with 2.3.29?

-- mingo

-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/smp-howto/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]