On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, Alan Watson wrote:
> Yes, 2.3.29 is a little better (8.4 seconds elapsed compared
> to 9.5 for 2.2.5 and 2.3.29), but still not at good as it
> should be (5.3 seconds elapsed):
you have a dual system, correct? Could you compare running 2 such tests at
once so that all CPUs are loaded? Something like:
time sh -c "gzip -1 <random | gzip -1 >/dev/null & gzip -1 <random | gzip
-1 >/dev/null"
and compare wall-clock time of this with two copies of the 'rsh trick'
solution. What are the elapsed times in that case?
-- mingo
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/dmentre/smp-howto/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
