On Friday 11 April 2014 13:09:08 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:25:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > Why do you have to enumerate the interrupts here? Can't you just
> > put all the numbers into the DT nodes of the devices using them?
>
> > In general, I would say that the mfd driver should not care about
> > what is connected to it.
>
> This then means that all the machines using the device need to define
> the interrupt table and have the MFD cells represented in the DT which
> means encoding Linux abstractions into the DT.
>
> In cases where the device is also used with ACPI or platform data that's
> a definite issue since they have different idioms. That applies less to
> PMICs tightly bound to particular SoCs but is an issue in general, not
> all the world is DT.
>
> There's also issues here with us changing our subsystems. Things like
> clocks are a bit indistinct at present, they're sort of floating between
> clock and other subsystems. We've also done things like invent extcon,
> making completely new subdevices. Keeping the data out of DT avoids
> problems when this happens. The balance changes a bit if there are
> clearly reusable IPs within the device but sadly hardware designers
> don't always give us that and even then sometimes we don't want to use
> them like that.
Ok, fair enough.
Arnd
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
