On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Hi Chen-Yu, > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 02:41:35PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> This patch provides of_get_gpiod_flags_by_name(), which looks up GPIO >> phandles by name only, through gpios/gpio-names, and not by index. > > IIRC, gpios only uses the *-gpios properties, and not gpios/gpio-names > pattern seen on various other things. > > Is it some new property you introduce? If so, please add it to the > documentation. > > Now, I'm not sure that having two distinct representations of GPIOs in > the DT is a good thing. Yes, it's looking odd compared to other > similar bindings, but it's what we have to deal with.
Mmmm I *think* I somehow remember a discussion about this topic recently, but I cannot find it. Maybe Chen-yu could point us to the conclusion of this discussion and the rationale for (re)implementing named GPIOs this way? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
