Hi,
On 18-12-14 03:48, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
On sun6i the cir block is attached to the reset controller, add support
for de-asserting the reset if a reset controller is specified in dt.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@osg.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/media/sunxi-ir.txt | 2 ++
drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/sunxi-ir.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/sunxi-ir.txt
index 23dd5ad..6b70b9b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/sunxi-ir.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/sunxi-ir.txt
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Required properties:
Optional properties:
- linux,rc-map-name : Remote control map name.
+- resets : phandle + reset specifier pair
Should it be optional? Or should we use a sun6i compatible with
a mandatory reset phandle? I mean, the driver/hardware is not
going to work with the reset missing on sun6i.
Seems we are doing it one way for some of our drivers, and
the other (optional) way for more generic ones, like USB.
I do not believe that we should add a new compatible just because
the reset line of a block is hooked up differently. It is the
exact same ip-block. Only now the reset is not controlled
through the apb-gate, but controlled separately.
Regards,
Hans
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
